English

Opposition members still inconsistent and flighty

The last session of the Committee on the Reform of Electoral Legislation gave rise to new uncertainties in the political public, as it remains unclear what kind of technical government the opposition wants.

After Mr Branimir Gvozdenović, president of the Committee, said that DPS thought there was no basis for the formation of technical government, member of the Socialist Democratic Party (SDP) board, Mr Raško Konjević, resigned .

Mr Konjević said he has suggested opening dialogue on technical government, but DPS rejected his suggestion. He said that his suggestion was just a beginning.

“I was very precise: it wasn’t just any kind of proposal, it was a question if DPS was willing to open the dialogue on technical government”, said Mr Konjević.

Democrats don’t think alike. By technical government, they mean technical government stipulated in the Agreement on Future.

“We’ve said so many times, the Agreement on Future, which clearly stipulates the model of technical government, was signed by 39 MPs. We haven’t noticed that some of them withdrew”, the statement of the Democrats says.

On the other side, independent MP, Mr Aleksandar Damjanović, said that signatories to the Agreement on Future should convey a clear message: they won’t take part in the elections without the government of civil trust.

Mr Damjanović thinks that boycott is an all-level option and is completely legitimate.

DPS member, Mr Miodrag Vuković, reiterated that there was no need for the formation of technical government, adding that political system “is stable”.

Mr Vuković points out that they are just looking for excuses for their defeats.

Anyway, it is clear that the opposition want something – technical government as it appears. And although some opposition members are trying to be precise, it remains unclear what is it they want from DPS.

 

Send this to a friend